Lent 2023
 
A Letter from TransEpiscopal to the Bishops and Standing Committees of the Episcopal Church:
 
Peace and blessings to you in the name of Christ. 
 
We, members of TransEpiscopal, standing alongside the LGBTQ+ Caucus and the Deputies of Color, write to you, the Bishops and Standing Committees of our Church, to urge you to decline to consent to the election of the Rev. Charlie Holt as bishop coadjutor of the Diocese of Florida. We ask you to take seriously the report of a “pattern and practice of LGBTQ clergy…not being treated equally with similarly situated clergy” by the Court of Review concerning the November 2022 bishop election in Florida, which found a serious pattern of violation of our Church’s non-discrimination canon. That canon states:
 
“No person shall be denied access to the discernment process or to any process for the employment, licensing, calling, or deployment for any ministry, lay or ordained, in this Church because of race, color, ethnic origin, immigration status, national origin, sex, marital or family status (including pregnancy and child care plans), sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, disabilities or age, except as otherwise provided by these Canons. No right to employment, licensing, ordination, call, deployment, or election is hereby established.” (Canon 3.1.2; see also Canon III.9.7a and Canon III.9.3a). 
 
The Court of Review named the existence of a long-term, systematic pattern of mistreatment and exclusion of LGBTQIA+ clergy in the diocese resulting in the hindrance of their capacity to vote in the election of a bishop coadjutor. The testimonies included in the report are palpably heartbreaking. These serious findings, which have implications beyond even the specific election process irregularities named in the report, were investigated and reported upon by an elected official body of The Episcopal Church, and reveal the election itself to be fundamentally unfair. We urge you to decline to consent to this election to bring pastoral care and healing to this diocese and begin to reform diocesan systems of ordination access and deployment. 
 
We also urge you not to default to an easy framing of this conversation as a referendum on the idea of “Communion Across Difference,” of the Episcopal Church as a “via media,” or “big tent,” and as a statement on whether theological conservatives truly belong in The Episcopal Church. At best such framing is a distraction, a red-herring argument. At worst it deceives from and covers over the structural elephant in the room: the systematic disenfranchisement of LGBTQIA+ people through long-standing pattern and practice, as the Court of Review report and subsequent news reports have underscored. 
 
Communion across difference does not mean allowing cultures of discrimination to exist and it cannot forestall our charge to be consistent with our nondiscrimination canons. Communion across difference means there is room for theological disagreement, but not for bullying, not for controlling a system to keep centering your position, not for obfuscating that control, and not for suppressing votes. A “big tent” Church cannot condone a false equivalency between being discriminated against because of race or ethnicity, national origin, immigration status, sex, marital or family status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, disability or age – all aspects of who someone is – and being disagreed with because of a theological position (as the Rev. Canon Susan Russell has emphasized for years). 
 
In that sense, the Diocese of Florida is not comparable to the Diocese of New Hampshire in 2003. The issue is not whether a diocese can elect the bishop who best fits their charism; we know of several recent bishops elected who hold conservative theological views, who were easily granted consent; but whether the process of that election fundamentally extends a pattern and practice of discrimination that we have agreed, in our polity, not to uphold. We also note that the bishop-elect, the Rev. Charlie Holt, has been working closely within that same discriminatory diocesan system since last summer. 
 
We believe more is at stake in this dispute than the outcome of one diocesan episcopal election. While the specifics of this situation are distinct to the Diocese of Florida, the issues and power dynamics at play here matter for and reverberate across the whole Church. We agree with the Diocese of Florida’s standing committee president, the Rev. Joe Gibbes, who observed in a recent opinion essay in The Living Church that “if standing committees had to show an unblemished report card for the sitting bishop to be permitted to elect a successor, no diocese would ever be able to elect!” We in TransEpiscopal can tell many stories of discrimination in employment and deployment across the Church effecting trans and non-binary clergy in recent years – although we are glad to be able to highlight growing acceptance as well, and we welcome with joy the recent reaffirmation of support for trans people from the House of Bishops. We know as well as anyone in the Church that we are all still on a journey in this Church to overcome discrimination across many dimensions. The difference in this case is that the Court of Review has made a serious finding of a pattern and practice of such discrimination. As bishops and standing committees, you have a responsibility to take their report into consideration in this case. Otherwise, we as a Church will be saying that this canon does not matter, in the breach. 
 
Our non-discrimination canons, adopted by General Convention, do point to an expansive, non-complementarian theology of the human, including a vision of marriage open to people beyond just heterosexual couples. We know not everyone accepts this theology fully, and we hope and pledge to stay in dialogue and relationship with those with whom we disagree. We, as trans and non-binary members of the Episcopal Church, and their families, fully believe that communion across difference is possible; we choose to take the risky path to see the face of Christ in one another and to love radically in the way Jesus calls us to. But we should also expect as a Church, that our systems will support us, full stop.
 
If your theology is different and if it accords with what the Church taught prior to the establishment of these non-discrimination canons — we reject the use of the term “traditional” to describe such a position, as if our position is somehow “untraditional”— you are still a beloved child of God and you still have a place at the table. We believe that in our journey together with God and each other, relationship is primary. We are called to walk the Way of Love together, for we know that when two or more are gathered in God’s holy name, God will be there. We are called to listen to each other in openness and walk alongside each other to the best of our abilities.
 
We are not called, however, to be tolerant of disrespect, bullying, intimidation, or being treated like doormats. Trans and non-binary people, the LGBTQIA+ community as a whole, and all historically marginalized communities, are done simply being tolerated and we are done tolerating theologies of the human that dehumanize us. The Church doesn’t get to dictate the terms of our presence nor to marginalize us. That’s what the canons say. Those are the terms in which we walk together. We are willing to do the work to walk as One. 
 
We understand that the current bishop of Florida, the Rt. Rev. John Howard was elected before some of this canon language was adopted and that the Church’s positions on these issues have shifted during the past 20 years. That is all the more reason, in this time of transition, to examine how diocesan systems match the canonical expectations of the wider Church. This should be true for any diocese in transition. 
 
Making these canons real is important, and it matters to us, deeply and personally. TransEpiscopal has been an integral part of the struggle to expand our non-discrimination canons. In 2009, we successfully advocated with a legislative committee and the House of Deputies that we should add language for gender identity and expression to Canon 3.1.2. However, when the House of Bishops voted to amend our resolution to wipe out all the specific language in the canon to instead say something like “all means all” but without specificity, we chose to ask the House of Deputies to reject their amendment and kill the resolution altogether for three years, because we believe so strongly that the particularity of that canonical language matters. We brought the resolution back in 2012 and we celebrated when it passed that General Convention in Indianapolis. 
 
We ask you to uphold these canons of our Church. The Rev. Joe Gibbes says in the aforementioned opinion piece in The Living Church that “the question of whether there has been a pattern of discrimination against LGBTQ people in the Diocese of Florida cannot be ignored, but neither is it properly addressed through a review of our election process.” We in TransEpiscopal profoundly disagree with this assertion. It is precisely in this moment of transition and high stakes for the whole Church that the canons must be upheld. Otherwise, they are just words.
 
As a Church, we have repeatedly affirmed that LGBTQIA+ people are beloved children of God, made in the Imago Dei, and that we have a place in God’s vision of the world. Consenting to an election conducted under processes and systems which denied this truth would be a step away from the Beloved Community we are called to be and to build. That is not the Beloved Community to which our Church has committed itself—as written into our canons, and hopefully, as well, practiced in our lives, day by day. 
 
We pray for your discernment and work.
 
In Christ,
 
Members of the TransEpiscopal Steering Committee:

The Rev. A.J. Buckley
Oregon

Donna Cartwright
Maryland
 
The Rev. M. E. Eccles
Chicago
 
The Rev. Gwen Fry
Maine
 
The Rev. Dr. Vicki Gray
California
 
The Rev. G. Green
Milwaukee
 
The Rev. Michelle Hansen
Connecticut

The Rev. Lauren Kay
Maine
 
The Rev. Rowan Larson
Massachusetts
 
Sarah Lawton
California
 
The Rev. Dr. Cameron Partridge
California

The Rev. Carla Robinson
Olympia
 
The Rev. Iain Stanford
California
 
Tieran Sweeny-Bender
Olympia
 
The Rev. Kit Wang
Maine

At the 2018 General Convention TransEpiscopal advocated for the passage of resolution D069, “Gather Annual Deployment and Compensation Data for LGBT and Gender Nonbinary Clergy.” Originally sponsored and endorsed by deputies Vanessa Stickler Glass at that time of the Diocese of California, and M.E. Eccles of the Diocese of Chicago, this resolution called for the gathering of data “using surveys and other mechanisms about: 1) the numbers of clergy who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender or gender nonbinary; 2) the deployment of such self-identified clergy, including whether their positions are part time, full time, or non-stipendiary; 3) their compensation, and 4) to broadly disseminate the report by electronic and other means.” Resolution D037 also called for an expansion of the annual “Clergy Compensation Report” to be able to analyze disparities on the basis of gender identity (specifically naming nonbinary in addition to female and male). We know anecdotally—indeed, from the experience of members of our own steering committee -- that there are LGBTIQ clergy who experience inequities and injustices in deployment and compensation. Stories of such experiences – such as that shared by Gwen Fry in a recent post -- are important and powerful. 
 
We believe that along with such stories, data can help us locate these stories within a larger story, by pointing the wider church to the systemic, structural issues that continue to require change. D069 and D037 complemented resolutions C029 and D005, which called for the maintenance of statistics on the race and ethnicity of those in bishop elections as well as all who are ordained “in order to show trends in ordination, deployment, and compensation by race and ethnicity, and to report broadly by electronic and other means.” This statistical collection and reporting was further described by C029 as part of the wider church’s process of “Becoming Beloved Community,” a framework emphasized by Presiding Bishop Michael Curry. 
 
In response to these resolutions, earlier this month an announcement came out: “The Episcopal Church invites all clergy to ‘Be a Part of the Picture’ as it seeks to Become Beloved Community.” The announcement calls for all clergy to participate in a study about the demographics, deployment, and compensation of clergy. 
 
To participate in the study, clergy are asked to go to this page of the Church Pension Group website and fill out a special section, “Information for Church Reporting.” The section heading explains, “the data collected on race/ethnicity, gender identity and sexual orientation will only be used for analysis and reported in aggregate form and will not be published or displayed on any public facing CPG website or printed in the Episcopal Clerical Directory. Individual data will be separated from data used to administer benefits.” 
 
Gender options in this section, which include an invitation to “check all that apply,” include “male, female, nonbinary” and then a “self-describe” write-in option, allowing for someone to write in trans specific language as best reflects their identity. 
 
Sexual orientation options in the form are more specific and expansive than what we have yet seen acknowledged in General Convention resolutions thus far: asexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual, heterosexual, pansexual, unsure, as well as a write-in option.
 
The Church Pension Group has also produced a video featuring leaders from across the church, including Presiding Bishop Michael Curry, who explains the importance of participating in this study: “I have a sneaking suspicion there’s an image of who and what the Episcopal Church is that may not conform to the actual reality of who and what the Episcopal Church is today. Having data really does help to inform us in terms of who we are and also in terms of who we want to be.” 
 
TransEpiscopal encourages all Episcopal clergy, particularly those who are trans and/or nonbinary, to participate in this study. We also appreciate all the effort that has gone in to bringing this process to fruition by so many behind the scenes. Aware as we are of trans people in the wider church who do not disclose this part of their history, we additionally appreciate the emphasis on confidentiality in this process, the promise that people’s information will not be shared without their consent. At the same time, several of us noted in updating our information that the Clerical Directory still does not have adequate public-facing, gender neutral options, whether in gender specific designations (e.g. it offers male or female only) or in titles. Particularly for those of us who are nonbinary identified and would like our entry in the Clerical Directory to reflect that truth, we ask CPG to expand the gender options for that public-facing directory. We consider such an expansion to align with resolution D090-2009 which encouraged “inclusive self-identification on all church data forms.”
 
We look forward to seeing the data produced by this study reflect more clearly who we already are and, as the Presiding Bishop put it, help give us more tools to assist the wider church in becoming who we want to be. Indeed, the Beloved Community God calls us to be.

by the Rev'd Gwen Fry

Last week I read an article from CTV News reporting on a trans woman, Junia Joplin, who is, well was, the pastor of a church in Ontario. It threw me back six plus years when, while serving a parish in Arkansas, I too came out as a trans person who would be socially transitioning. Junia’s story was all too familiar. Well at least this part of her story was my story as well. You see, Junia came out to her congregation during her sermon a little over a month ago. I suppose she was lucky that her parish took a month to discern and vote on whether to keep her or fire her for being transgender. Sitting on this side of my history, I’m not sure if it was a blessing or an abominable curse that they spent a month “discerning” Junia’s worthiness to be the spiritual leader of the congregation. In the three days it took for my parish to come to a decision to “dissolve the pastoral relationship” I had to bear the burden of tv news stations camping out in front of our house and being in the news cycle for five days. I received nasty threatening emails and text messages from strangers I didn’t even know both locally and nationally. They threatened my safety just because I am a trans woman. I pray Junia didn’t have to run the gauntlet that I did in that month leading up to the vote to fire her because she is a pastor who just happens to be a trans woman. 

In the story Junia said, "I had a wonderful friend who took me out to dinner just to keep my mind off what might be going on and I had a cry but I tried to almost immediately start thinking about what comes next.”

Junia was already thinking about what would come next even before the votes on her future at the church were tallied. We transgender people in the church know what that’s like better than most. We clergy who are trans have made a great deal of progress in just a few short years. A great deal of progress has been made in the church since my coming out. The church has passed many resolutions at General Conventions since 2009, making it possible for trans people to be protected and incorporated more easily in the church at all levels and this is so very good. The challenge for the church now is ensuring those resolutions that have been passed make an impact all the way to the parish level. While transgender clergy are being accepted more and more in the church, that acceptance seems to be weighted much more heavily in the favor of lay members who are transgender and clergy who identify and express themselves as trans men. But that shouldn’t be surprising should it? Everyone in the church knows that women clergy have a much more difficult time being hired in the church than male clergy. There are even Facebook groups dedicated to women breaking the glass ceiling in the church. And even as difficult as it is for women to be hired for parochial positions in the church, it’s is even more difficult for a trans woman clergy person to be called to a church position. So, Junia’s question is an important one. What does come next for trans clergy, and especially clergy who identify as trans women, in a church where we have been given legislative equality but yet strive for acceptance and inclusion at the local parish level? What will it take for us to become the beloved community we all yearn to experience?
 
The bias and discrimination toward trans women is very real. I believe that the only way to get beyond this is to broaden the experience of the wider church with those of us who identify as trans women as well as clergy who identify as nonbinary, of which we have a growing number in The Episcopal Church. It isn’t easy hearing a bishop say, “the church isn’t ready for you yet.” And yet, this is where the church is at this time. I often joke with folks by telling them that my ministry in the church is now applying for positions as a trans woman so search committees are exposed to trans people in the clergy. But seriously, I do think one of the missions and ministries I can offer the church is to make myself available to those seeking to create a church where the ministries of all people are raised up and celebrated. By being vulnerable enough to meet others face to face and show them the unfathomable love of God I have experienced in my journey, I pray that some day the church that has nurtured me to become the authentic person I am will truly come to accept, embrace and celebrate all the children of God. Particularly those of us who identify as transgender.

​We in the transgender community are resilient and can persevere. As individuals we often get knocked off of our feet only to get back up time and time again. I am a living example of this as I sit here in Maine writing while my spouse is in the home office writing her sermon for next Sunday. The transgender community has made great strides in the church and society and we are thankful for the progress we have made. But we have so far to go before we are accepted and celebrated in our communities. The transgender community has so many gifts the church desperately needs and we will be standing and waiting right here while the church continues its discernment of where we might fit in as leaders in The Episcopal Church in your neighborhood.

TransEpiscopal adds our voice to those (including fellow Episcopalians) who stand against the strategic attempt by the Trump administration, which emerged earlier this week, to sharply narrow the federal definition of sex (and of “sex discrimination”) under Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972. The proposal limits the definition to “a person’s status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth.” This position flies in the face of the reality that sex/gender is biologically as well as socially and culturally complex. It also undermines and perpetuates our community’s lived reality of discrimination and oppression. We consider our complexity a gift to be celebrated and embraced, not a threat to be denied, stigmatized, and eradicated. 
 
At its highest levels, the Episcopal Church has affirmed trans/nonbinary people as made in the image of God. The Church has affirmed our presence and our leadership, lay and ordained alike, at all of its levels. Because we know that laws and policies that define and administer gender can facilitate or undermine our lives in very real ways, the Episcopal Church has been working at the churchwide level for over a decade to open the Church’s own canons and policies. The Church took further steps in that work at its triennial General Convention this summer, and our work continues. 
 
Should it be fully realized, the Trump administration’s proposal could have serious and far-reaching implications for trans and/or nonbinary, intersex and broadly gender non-conforming people in access to health care, education, housing, employment, travel, public accommodations, and basic safety. Its most detrimental impact could be felt by people who experience transphobia combined with racism, misogyny, xenophobia, classism, and/or ableism. We think of how this news has emerged in a week when President Trump has also been vilifying a group of migrants making their way north to seek asylum, having been displaced by dangerous situations in Honduras and Guatemala. As Transgender Day of Remembrance approaches next month, we grieve the disproportionate loss of far too many transgender women of color, including Roxana Hernandez who died in May while in the custody of ICE. We are mindful of the trans/nonbinary community in Massachusetts whose protected access to public accommodations is being put to a statewide vote next week (please vote #YesOn3). We deplore the exploitation of various marginalized groups as wedge issues to stoke fear and hate. We stand with all who are oppressed and used for political gain. No one can erase our basic humanity. No one can define us out of existence. Our light cannot be put out. As the queer slogan declares, we are everywhere. 
 
In the Acts of the Apostles, an angry mob in Thessalonica, reacting to the ministry and teaching of Paul and Silas, declared, “These people who have been turning the world upside down have come here also” (Acts 17:6). The Good News they were proclaiming declared the casting down of the mighty from their thrones, the uplifting of the lowly, the release of captives, the freeing of the oppressed, the recovery of vision. Then and now, this vision threatens to turn the world of those at the center power upside down. As Christians, we are called to follow Jesus Christ in this work. God calls all of us together, across lines of identity and embodiment to be a transformative people, to join in manifesting God’s vision for the world (basilea), the divine dream of justice poured out and peace that passes all understanding. 
 
All of us are called to stand up in concrete ways for trans/non binary people, and indeed for all who are struggling against structural injustice and oppression. In this election season, where we can stand against direct efforts to undermine us, please do: vote, and do whatever you can to resist voter suppression. At your places of employment, in your cities and towns, in your congregations, make sure your trans/nonbinary neighbors have a voice. Reach out to one another, refuse isolation or attempts to pit us against one another, and build or strengthen relationships. Join in what our Presiding Bishop Michael Curry has called the Way of Love.
 
#WontBeErased #TransformTheVote #YesOn3 #WayofLove

We are at the end of February, and this year’s very long season of Epiphany is almost at an end as well. Here in the Boston area, side streets are still littered with chairs and other detritus-- markers of the you-shovel-it-you-keep-it parking culture-- but snow banks are finally showing signs of letting go. Last week the state’s transgender community also received welcome news that perhaps the long-frozen nondiscrimination bill, too, might be starting to thaw.  

As recently posted on Walking with Integrity, last week Governor Deval Patrick signed an executive order banning discrimination on the basis of gender identity and expression for all who work for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Boston Globe both reported on the move and published an editorial praising it, and yesterday the local LGBT paper Bay Windows published a comprehensive article on it as well.

As reported in all three pieces, this development both creates a sense of momentum for the statewide bill which would add "gender identity and expression" to the categories of age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, sex, and marital status, and prevent discrimination on those bases in employment as well as in housing, public accommodations, education, and credit. 

The dire need for this protection was just underscored by the major new study, the National Transgender Discrimination Survey, released on February 4th by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Center for Transgender Equality. They surveyed over 6,450 transgender-identified participants and learned the following, as summarized on NCTE's website:

"* Respondents were nearly four times more likely to live in extreme poverty, with household income of less than $10,000.

* Respondents were twice as likely to be unemployed compared to the population as a whole. Half of those surveyed reported experiencing harassment or other mistreatment in the workplace, and one in four were fired because of their gender identity or expression.

* While discrimination was pervasive for the entire sample, it was particularly pronounced for people of color. African-American transgender respondents fared far worse than all others in many areas studied.

* Housing discrimination was also common. 19% reported being refused a home or apartment and 11% reported being evicted because of their gender identity or expression. One in five respondents experienced homelessness because of their gender identity or expression.

* An astonishing 41% of respondents reported attempting suicide, compared to only 1.6% of the general population.

* Discrimination in health care and poor health outcomes were frequently experienced by respondents. 19% reported being refused care due to bias against transgender or gender-nonconforming people, with this figure even higher for respondents of color. Respondents also had over four times the national average of HIV infection.

* Harassment by law enforcement was reported by 22% of respondents and nearly half were uncomfortable seeking police assistance.

* Despite the hardships they often face, transgender and gender non-conforming persons persevere. Over 78% reported feeling more comfortable at work and their performance improving after transitioning, despite the same levels of harassment in the workplace."

An interview from the Bay Windows story shows both some of the unexpected ways that people's transgender status can come up in an employment application process and the reality that there are indeed workplaces where people are free to do their jobs and be themselves. Diane DeLap, who works for the Department of Workforce Development, explained how her application process inadvertently revealed her transgender status to her prospective employer: "'One of the interesting things was that the Massachusetts Employment Application requires the inclusion of discharge papers if you have a history in the military,' DeLap said. She had served in the Navy for four years, and included her discharge papers with her application. 'Of course, the military doesn’t change names for anything,' DeLap said, laughing, 'so it had my old name on there and all the other papers had the new name on there, so the fact that I was transgender became a topic of discussion very early in the hiring process. They determined that it shouldn’t make any difference.'"

DeLap clearly had a good experience in her interview process, and others I know also have had positive experiences coming out at work. Increasingly, there is good news of that sort to tell, and it is important to share it along with the alarming statistics and stories, as both are realities right now. The latter tells us how much work we have to do while the former encourages us that it has already begun and we can indeed do it.

As with marriage equality, which received a major boost from the Obama administration this week, I am hopeful that the ice is truly beginning to thaw for transgender equality, that momentum is finally building toward passage of key legal protections. It is up to us to keep that momentum going.

The executive summary of the NCTE/NGLTF survey can be found here, and the full report here.

- The Rev'd Dr. Cameron Partridge

This post was cross posted from Walking with Integrity